USPTO serial 77939867
NIGHTLIFENATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIGHTLIFENATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, headwear, footwear, jackets, sweatshirts, shorts, sweat suits, hats, underwear and beanies | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2011 |
| 035 | Providing on-line retail information services, except in the field of event ticketing, for entertainment, music and cultural events inclusive of a nightclub cover charge discount program; promoting goods and services of others by placement of classified advertisements, except related to event ticketing, in a web site accessed through the global computer information network and consulting services connected therewith; electronic billboard advertising, except related to event ticketing | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing leisure, arts and entertainment information, except related to event ticketing, by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tanase & Associates, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Tanase & Associates, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NIGHTLIFENATION
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 16, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 16, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |