USPTO serial 77940922
ENTREPRENEURSHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENTREPRENEURSHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cameron Park, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advice in the running of establishments as franchises; Assistance in business management and product commercialization, within the framework of a franchise contract; Assistance in franchised commercial business management; Assistance, advice and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management and business organization relating to purchasing functions; Branding services, namely, consulting, development, management and marketing of brands for businesses; Business consultation services; Business management advisory services relating to franchising; Franchise services, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and operation of restaurants, advertising agencies, automotive retail and repair shops, beauty parlors, building storage facilities, decorating firms, retail stores containing children's products, computer stores, dry cleaning and laundry establishments, event planning firms, financial services agencies, fitness studios, restaurants, health consultants, medical offices, home improvement retail stores, temporary lodging establishments, maintenance, restoration and cleaning businesses, pet care businesses, print, copy and mail businesses, real estate agencies, shoe stores and car washes; Franchising, namely, consultation and assistance in business management, organization and promotion; Franchising, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants, advertising agencies, automotive retail and repair shops, beauty parlors, building storage facilities, decorating firms, retail stores containing children's products, computer stores, dry cleaning and laundry establishments, event planning firms, financial services agencies, fitness studios, restaurants, health consultants, medical offices, home improvement retail stores, temporary lodging establishments, maintenance, restoration and cleaning businesses, pet care businesses, print, copy and mail businesses, real estate agencies, shoe stores and car washes | ACTIVE | May 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNR1 | NOTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |