USPTO serial 77941289
Serial No. 77941289
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 77941289?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burns Harbor, IN
Burns Harbor, IN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Construction or building materials, namely, non-metallic fibrous mesh for use in masonry wall construction, sold only as an integral component of a flashing system | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |