Drawing for TOP

USPTO serial 77943139

TOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software used to enable real-time bidirectional access between mobile devices and alternate human-machine interfaces, namely, laptops, PCs, and embedded interfaces, providing access to manipulate both local and remote applications and information including SMS, email, instant messaging, telephony, calendar, Internet access, leveraging the strengths of alternate human-machine including a full-size keyboard, screen and supporting environmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 24, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 25, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 25, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 25, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Feb 19, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 24, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Aug 14, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 11, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 11, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jul 10, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 6, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 6, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 6, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 30, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 30, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 30, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Dec 28, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 3, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Mar 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 26, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance