Drawing for PURITY

USPTO serial 77943362

PURITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Niermann

Mark Niermann Dean Foods Company2711 North Haskell Avenue, Suite 3400Dallas, TX 75204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurtACTIVE—
030Frozen confections; Frozen yogurt; Ice cream; Ice cream sandwiches; Iced tea; SherbetACTIVE—
032Bottled drinking water; Fruit drinks; Lemonades; Orange juiceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 13, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 13, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 12, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 12, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 27, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 24, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 14, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 11, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 6, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance