USPTO serial 77943444
BODY ALIGNMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BODY ALIGNMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dan Cohn
DAN COHN HUSCH BLACKWELL SANDERS LLP190 CARONDELET PLZ STE 600SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105-3433UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Athletic clothing and sportswear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |