Drawing for PEABODY & PAISLEY

USPTO serial 77944175

PEABODY & PAISLEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEABODY & PAISLEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Fragrances; essential oils; disposable wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds for household use; furniture cleaner in the nature of wood and fabric cleaner; carpet cleaner; glass cleaner; all purpose cleaner; hand cleaners; all purpose household cleaner; bleaching preparations for household use; laundry detergent; dish detergent; cleaning preparations for cleansing drainsACTIVE
005Disinfectant bathroom cleanerACTIVE
016Paper towels; tissue paperACTIVE
021Trash cans; sponges, namely, porous bath sponges and kitchen cleaning sponges; disposable gloves for home use; squeegeesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 5, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 2, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 2, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 13, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 7, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 12, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 12, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 8, 2011IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED
Apr 8, 2011EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2011INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST
Apr 6, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 4, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 4, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Apr 4, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 10, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 24, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 24, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 3, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Mar 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 27, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance