USPTO serial 77956470
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bethany L. LaFlam
5000 BIRCH ST STE 9400NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-8128Newport Beach, CA 92660| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Filed without Basis) Computer card adapter; Computer equipment, namely, wireless cards; Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable electronic games and music via the internet and wireless devices; Electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; Electronic game software for wireless devices; Wireless communication devices for voice, data or image transmission(Based on Use in Commerce) Electronic game programs; Interactive multimedia computer game program; Interactive video game programs; Video game cartridges and cassettes; Video game discs; Video game software | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |