USPTO serial 77975546
SCENECHRONIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3459252Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2008
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCENECHRONIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing a database in the field of entertainment production; providing a website featuring information and consultation services in the field of entertainment production | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 19, 2007 |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting application computer software of others; application service provider (ASP) services in the nature of production management; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for production management in the field of film, television, and other entertainment production; application service provider (ASP), namely, providing non-downloadable software tools used for scheduling, staffing, script management, and providing online communications between users in the field of entertainment production; providing online non-downloadable software for use in database management; providing a website featuring software tools for online film, television, video, and commercial production | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 19, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clever Machine, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clever Machine, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clever Machine, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SCENECHRONIZE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 24, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |