USPTO serial 77975991
CELERIE KEMBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3535293Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELERIE KEMBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen A. Fefferman
Kemble, Cecilia Galvin & Palmer630 Third Ave23rd floorNEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bedding consisting of sheets, pillow cases, comforters, coverlets, throws, duvets, shams, bed skirts and window dressings, namely, curtains, draperies, fabric valances, fabric panels, sheers, swags, tiers and curtain tie-backs | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - SEE PUBLIC NOTE | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 25, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |