USPTO serial 77976361
OPENBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3604221Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2009
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPENBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Altos, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
KENNETH L WILTON SEYFARTH SHAW LLP2029 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 3500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the collection editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage, and sharing of data and information, computer services, namely, providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, the web pages providing an interface for the collection | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |