USPTO serial 77976885
EVERYONE CAN COOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4211966Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2012
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EVERYONE CAN COOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K. Ebling
Louis K. Ebling Thompson Hine LLP312 Walnut Street, Suite 1400Cincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely, recipe books and cookbooks, newspapers, magazines and newsletters featuring information, articles and discussions about food, cooking and cooking instruction | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |