USPTO serial 77980159
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Montvale, NJ
Other trademarks owned by The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Montvale, NJ
Other trademarks owned by The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Allegiance Retail services, LLC
Iselin, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter A. Luccarelli Jr.
Peter A. Luccarelli Jr. ALLEGIANCE RETAIL SERVICES, LLC485D Route 1 South, Suite 420Iselin, NJ, 08830UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Shampoos and hair conditioners; skin moisturizers; human body conditioners; skin treatment lotions and creams; anti-aging and stretch mark creams; non-medicated lotions and creams for hands, nails, skin, face, hair, foot and leg muscles and joints; depilatory lotions and creams; shaving lotions and creams; non-medicated skin care preparation, namely, lotions and creams for treating dry and damaged skin, anti-aging, firming, anti-wrinkle, stretch marks, under eye and eyelid firming; gels, namely, depilatory gels, shaving gels, shower gels; oils, namely, body oils, non-medicated human body serums; soaps; liquid soaps; bar soaps; anti-bacterial liquid soaps; anti-bacterial bar soaps; body washing soaps; bubble bath; body and facial scrubs; masks, namely, beauty masks, facial masks, body masks, gel eye masks, skin masks, and skin moisturizer masks; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, face peels; cosmetic sun protection creams and lotions, sun creams and lotions; sun block; soaps and detergents for household use for the purposes of cleaning and maintenance without harm to the environment | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2016 |
| 005 | Hand sanitizing preparations; dietary food supplements | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2016 |
| 016 | Paper towels; paper table cloths; paper napkins; bathroom tissue; notebooks; notebook paper; and facial tissues | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2017 |
| 029 | Frozen hamburger patties; processed edible seeds; processed nuts; dried fruits; raisins; trail mix, namely, snack mixes primarily consisting of processed fruits, processed nuts, pretzels; potato chips | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2017 |
| 030 | Teas; sesame sticks; chocolate coated nuts; yogurt coated nuts; macaroni and cheese; pesto sauce; bread; tortillas; tortillas chips | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2017 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |