USPTO serial 77980326
CDF FIREFIGHTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CDF FIREFIGHTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Beldiman
44 MONTGOMERY ST STE 400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-4606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Lapel pins, rings, tie pins, tie tacks, tie clasps, watches, collectable coins, commemorative coins, challenge coins, key rings of precious metal, key fobs of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |