USPTO serial 77981266
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Primet Precision Materials, Inc.
Ithaca, NY
Primet Precision Materials, Inc.
Ithaca, NY
Primet Precision Materials, Inc.
Ithaca, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
Douglas R. Wolf WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Organic and inorganic micron and nano particles in the nature of chemical preparations for further processing and synthesis for industrial applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacturing services for others in the field of particle engineering industrial technology equipment for [ commercial and ] industrial use; custom manufacturing featuring the shaping and sizing of micron and nano particles for commercial and industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development services in the field of particle engineering | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| May 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |