USPTO serial 77983287
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Saint-Lambert, QUEBEC, CA
Saint-Lambert, QUEBEC, CA
Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017-4046| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely, magazines and books in the culinary field | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Kitchen utensils and accessories, namely, household containers for food, cooking pots, saucepans, corkscrews, kettles, cake molds, dishes, carafes, potpourri dishes, glass beverageware, cooking strainers, cheese graters, knife blocks, salt shakers, pepper shakers, butter dishes and lunch boxes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Oven mitts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Aprons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Production of television programs in the culinary field | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 29, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |