Drawing for GAMECASTER

USPTO serial 78000589

GAMECASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GAMECASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS D. FOSTER

THOMAS D FOSTER DAVID R. PRESTON & ASSOCIATES, APC12625 HIGH BLF DRSTE 205SAN DIEGO, CA 92130

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Television and Internet broadcasting of computer game tournamentsACTIVEOct 1, 1999
041Internet website featuring news, information, entertainment, education, and analysis of computer game tournaments, computer game players, computer game software and computer game hardware; Internet and television show featuring news, information, entertainment, education, and analysis of computer game tournaments, computer game players, computer game software and computer game hardwareACTIVEOct 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 2, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 9, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Aug 4, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 4, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 24, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 7, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jan 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2002CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY
Oct 30, 2001R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Aug 30, 2001CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Jul 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 3, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance