USPTO serial 78005124
CDT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2972558Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CDT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LIQUID AND GAS PURIFICATION UNITS, NAMELY CAPACITIVE DEIONIZATION SYSTEM CONSISTING OF CARBON BASED AEROGEL MATERIAL, ELECTRODES, ENERGY, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, AND COMPONENTS THEREFORE FOR CAPTURING AND SEPARATING IONS AND OTHER CHARGED PARTICLES FROM LIQUIDS OR GASES FOR THE PURPOSE OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 2004 |
| 010 | LIQUID AND GAS PURIFICATION UNITS, NAMELY CAPACITIVE DEIONIZATION SYSTEM CONSISTING OF CARBON BASED AEROGEL MATERIAL, ELECTRODES, ENERGY, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, AND COMPONENTS THEREFORE FOR CAPTURING AND SEPARATING IONS AND OTHER CHARGED PARTICLES FROM LIQUIDS OR GASES FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEDICAL DIALYSIS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 2004 |
| 011 | LIQUID AND GAS PURIFICATION UNITS, NAMELY CAPACITIVE DEIONIZATION SYSTEM CONSISTING OF CARBON BASED AEROGEL, ELECTRODES, ENERGY, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, AND COMPONENTS THEREFORE FOR CAPTURING AND SEPARATING IONS AND OTHER CHARGED PARTICLES FROM LIQUIDS OR GASES FOR DESALINATION, WATER PURIFICATION, WASTE WATER CONCENTRATION, NON-MEDICAL DIALYSIS, AND COOLANT CONDITIONING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CDT SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CDT SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CDT SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FAR WEST GROUP, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named CDT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |