USPTO serial 78007785
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly G. Russell
KIMBERLY G RUSSELL PIPER RUDNICK LLP333 MARKET ST STE 3200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2150UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the sale of goods and services of others through the distribution of on-line, print, and media promotional material and promotional contests | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Subscription television broadcasting services and television broadcasting services; transmission of cable and digital television and interactive audio and video services, and digital and cable television transmission of personalized and interactive television programming | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, personalized and interactive entertainment services in the nature of providing personalized television programming, and interactive cable and digital television programming, and entertainment information, namely, an online network guide to personalized and interactive television programming; providing a computer game that may be accessed network wide by network users | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |