Drawing for CONTROL IT

USPTO serial 78010647

CONTROL IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTROL IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL M. RICKIN

MICHAEL M RICKIN ABB AUTOMATION INC29801 EUCLID AVEWICKLIFFE, OH 44092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial robotsACTIVE—
009APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING, ANALYZING, RECORDING, CONTROLLING AND REGULATING PHYSICAL QUANTITIES, CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, AND INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES NAMELY, FLOWMETERS, SCANNERS, SENSORS, ELECTRONIC ACTUATORS, AUTOMATIC VALVES, TRANSMITTERS FOR SIGNALS, TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE, VALVE POSITIONERS, CONVERTERS, PROCESS VARIABLE DATA RECORDERS, GAS AND LIQUID ANALYZERS; WATER, GAS, ELECTRICITY AND ENERGY METERS; COMPUTERS, MICROPROCESSORS; ELECTRICAL CABLES, CONDUCTORS, AND WIRES; SUBSTATION AUTOMATION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRICAL SUBSTATIONS USED FOR SETTING PROTECTION PARAMETERS AND PROVIDING AN INTERFACE TO AN OPERATOR, SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING FAULTS, SOFTWARE FOR RETRIEVING DISTURBANCE DATA, SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING A SUBSTATION ELECTRICAL NETWORK, SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING AN INTERFACE TO AN OPERATOR, SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING FAULTS DATA AND FAULT LOCATION DATA, SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING MAINTENANCE OF A SUBSTATION; AND POWER SYSTEM PROTECTIVE RELAYSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 8, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 8, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 5, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance