USPTO serial 78010676
OFFLINEFN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OFFLINEFN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Frankfurt, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | SERIES OF NON-FICTION BOOKS FEATURING PERSONAL FINANCIAL INVESTMENT NEWS AND INFORMATION; MAGAZINES FEATURING PERSONAL FINANCIAL INVESTMENT NEWS AND INFORMATION; REFERENCE BOOKS FEATURING PERSONAL FINANCIAL INVESTMENT NEWS AND INFORMATION; GUIDE BOOKS FEATURING PERSONAL FINANCIAL INVESTMENT NEWS AND INFORMATION; AND ALSO A SERVICE THAT MARKETS PERSONAL FINANCIAL INVESTMENT NEWS AND INFORMATION TO MEDIA OUTLETS, SUCH AS NEWSPAPERS AND MAGAZINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |