USPTO serial 78013355
RHEOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 25, 2003
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RHEOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Puteaux, FR
Puteaux, FR
Puteaux, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Prince
ALSTON & BIRD LLP601 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WN BLDG 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF RHEOLOGICAL AND FATIGUE DATA FOR STEEL, NAMELY, DATA THAT ALLOWS THE USER TO CHOOSE THE MOST SUITABLE GRADE OF STEEL BASED ON THE USER'S PARTICULAR PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF STEEL, ITS PROPERTIES AND USES AS THEY RELATE TO STEEL PROCESSING, NAMELY, INFORMATION REGARDING THE SIMULATED BEHAVIOR OF STEEL; PROVIDING AN ONLINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF RHEOLOGICAL AND FATIGUE DATA FOR STEEL, NAMELY, DATA THAT ALLOWS THE USER TO CHOOSE THE MOST SUITABLE GRADE OF STEEL BASED ON THE USER'S PARTICULAR PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF STEEL PROCESSING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |