Drawing for ROCKETCAM

USPTO serial 78018355

ROCKETCAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCKETCAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL E. PFAU

MICHAEL E PFAU REICKER, PFAU, PYLE, MCROY & HERMAN LLP1421 STATE ST STE BSANTA BARBARA, CA 93101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009RADIO TRANSMITTERS AND VIDEO AND STILL CAMERAS USED BY THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY TO DELIVER MISSION-READY, ANALOG (REAL TIME) OR DIGITAL (REAL TIME AND STORED) VIDEO AND IMAGES IN HIGH-STRESS AND EXTREME TEMPERATURE ENVIRONMENTS DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR USE ON SPACE VEHICLESACTIVEApr 26, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2002PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN
Oct 19, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER
Sep 19, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Jun 20, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 22, 2002ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Apr 22, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 9, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 9, 2000AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance