USPTO serial 78019041
LAN ASSOCIATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAN ASSOCIATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION PLANNING; CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2000 |
| 042 | ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, INCLUDING USING THE LATEST RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES TO KEEP ABREAST OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS, AT THE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL, AND ENSURING THAT CLIENTS ARE AWARE OF, RESPONSIVE TO, AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH LAWS AND REGULATIONS; LAND SURVEYING; AND ENGINEERING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |