USPTO serial 78020546
ELITE PHYSIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELITE PHYSIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gainesville, FL
Gainesville, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SETH M BLUM
SETH M BLUM SALIWANCHIK LLC & SALIWANCHIK PA2421 NW 41ST ST STE A1GAINESVILLE, FL 32606-6669UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VITAMINS AND MEAL REPLACEMENT DRINKS; PROTEIN-BASED MEAL REPLACEMENT BARS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATERIAL, NAMELY MAGAZINES AND NEWSLETTERS IN THE FIELD OF WEIGHT LIFTING | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | WEIGHT LIFTING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, WEIGHT LIFTING MACHINES, BENCHES AND BENCH ACCESSORIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | SPORTS DRINKS AND WATER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Williams, Glen S.
- Other trademarks owned by Williams, Glen S.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named ELITE PHYSIQUE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |