Drawing for RUSHING SPRINGS

USPTO serial 78023073

RUSHING SPRINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUSHING SPRINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Plumley

DAVID A PLUMLEY CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032DRINKING WATERACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 15, 2002REINREINSTATED
Jan 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Dec 26, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance