USPTO serial 78024995
VALUELINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VALUELINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Zellinger
JAMES A ZELLINGER SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION INC410 SWING RDGREENSBORO, NC 27409UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF AGRICULTURE; COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF AGRICULTURE, NAMELY, COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE USED TO ACCESS AND TRANSMIT INFORMATION FROM AN ONLINE DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF AGRICULTURE | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS GATEWAY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF AGRICULTURE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |