USPTO serial 78025962
VIDEOBRIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIDEOBRIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID P. PETERSEN
DAVID P PETERSEN KLARQUIST SPARKMAN CAMPBELL, ET ALONE WORLD TRADE CTR STE 1600121 S W SLAMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used for linking to electronic networks from media signals, namely from steganographically hidden information contained in video signals; computer software for encoding video signals with steganographically hidden digital information and for decoding such steganographically hidden digital information from such video signals; pre-recorded video recordings containing steganographically hidden coded digital information embedded therein and stored in video containing media, namely in CDs, DVDs, videotapes, audio-video tapes, computer memory and electronic files; and computer software for recognizing steganographically hidden information in video signals and for linking to computers through the Internet or through an intranet based upon the recognized steganographically hidden information | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising consultancy and business consultancy services provided to creators, publishers and distributors of such video containing media in the field of encoding and decoding steganographically hidden digital information in such video containing media; brand promotion services, namely, utilizing steganographically hidden information contained in such video media to direct consumers to e-commerce and other brand-related Internet sites; marketing consultancy services provided by monitoring, steganographically hidden digital information in such video containing media | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronically linking two or more computer sites together based on steganographically hidden digital information in video signals; electronic transmission of video signals containing steganographically hidden digital information via computer terminals using video signals as the steganographically hidden digital information carrier, and utilizing steganographically hidden digital information in such video containing media and in video signals in communicating ownership and other information using the Internet or an intranet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |