Drawing for GOURMET ESSENTIALS

USPTO serial 78026848

GOURMET ESSENTIALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOURMET ESSENTIALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea P. Denklau

ANDREA P DENKLAU WHIRLPOOL PROPERTIES, INC500 RENAISSANCE DRSTE 101SAINT JOSEPH, MI 49085

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cookware, namely, sauce pans, skillets, saute pans, sauteuses, frying pans, stock pots, dutch ovens, sauce pots, casserole dishes, non-electric griddles, grill pans, woks, pans and parts thereforACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jan 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 11, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 9, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 24, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 19, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance