USPTO serial 78027944
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Pointe Claire Quebec, CA
Pointe Claire Quebec, CA
Pointe Claire Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
CHARLES P BOUDREAULT CONVERGIA INC237 HYMUS BLVDPOINTE CLAIRE, QC H9R 5C7CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing local and long distance telephone services; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; providing multiple-user high speed access to a global computer information network; providing fiber optic network service; providing local and long distance electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, graphics, signals, and messages by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, global computer network and satellite transmissions; providing telephone voice messaging services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |