Drawing for BIND

USPTO serial 78035866

BIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES E. WEINSTEIN,

CHARLES E WEINSTEIN, FOLEY, HOAG LLP155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02110-2600UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING DATABASES FEATURING INFORMATION ON PROTEIN-PROTEIN, PROTEIN-LIGAND AND PROTEIN-DRUG INTERACTIONS; AND DATABASE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, CRATING CUSTOM SATELLITE DATABASES FOR PROTEIN-PROTEIN, PROTEIN-LIGAND, AND PROTEIN-DRUG INFORMATION FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND BIOTECHNOLOGYACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 6, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Feb 1, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jan 27, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 11, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Sep 10, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 16, 2004LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST
Jun 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 24, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 28, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 26, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 11, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 12, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance