USPTO serial 78036058
MONTINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2727106Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MONTINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RONAN, MT
PABLO, MT
Bozeman, MT
Bozeman, MT
Bozeman, MT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jean Kyle
Jean Kyle Jean Kyle, P.C.P.O. Box 2274Hamilton, MT 59840-4274UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Gluten free flour and gluten free products;, namely, bread mixes muffin mixes, brownie mix, waffle mix, pancake mix, and [ prepared and packaged bread,] cakes, muffins, cookies, [ crackers,] pizza crust, [ breakfast cereals,] brownies [, tortillas and flour based chips ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMAZING GRAINS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AMAZING GRAINS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Anderson, Timothy W
- Other trademarks owned by Anderson, Timothy W
- Other trademarks owned by Anderson, Timothy W
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MONTINA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 25, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |