USPTO serial 78037220
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Valencia Estado Carabobo, VE
Valencia Estado Carabobo, VE
Valencia Estado Carabobo, VE
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Grinded and toasted coffee | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |