USPTO serial 78037509
CONVERGIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONVERGIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pointe Claire, Quebec, CA
Pointe Claire, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
PERRY J VISCOUNTY LATHAM & WATKINS650 TOWN CTR DR STE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER HIGH SPEED ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING FIBER OPTIC NETWORK SERVICE; PROVIDING LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC, AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, IMAGES, GRAPHICS, SIGNALS, AND MESSAGES BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE, TELEGRAPHIC, CABLE, GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSIONS; PROVIDING TELEPHONE VOICE MESSAGING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |