USPTO serial 78038484
RHINO-RACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RHINO-RACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rydalmere NSW, AU
Rydalmere NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley P. Hartman
BRADLEY P HARTMAN MORRISON & HECKER LLPSTE 2100 1850 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004-4584UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Metal and plastic roof racks for use on vehicles | ABANDONED | May 25, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |