Drawing for IZAR

USPTO serial 78040725

IZAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IZAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Emilio Giminez Diaz-Oyuelos

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on 44(e)) apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, namely, automobiles, cars, airplanes, trucks, ships and boatsACTIVE—
037(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on 44(e)) building construction and repair; construction and repair of boats, ships and airplanesACTIVE—
043(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on 44(e)) Providing of food and drink; Arranging temporary housing accommodationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 31, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance