USPTO serial 78041182
NERVANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, KARLA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NERVANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used for computer operating systems, namely, software for querying via one or more queries integrated multi-scoured data sets, including using natural language and semantical queries, across multiple devices; computer software for derivative software namely software for development and enhancement of computer software applications; computer application software that provides tools, clients, servers and interfaces for semantically encoding, publishing, managing, accessing, searching and editing heterogeneous data and information on multiple computer systems including desktop, networked, laptops, palm and handheld computers; computer software for active and automated collaborative filtering for creating and parsing data queries; computer software for tracking, modeling, developing, deploying, utilizing, retrieving, recording, storing, searching mining, accessing, managing, publishing, editing and semantic encoding; computer software development tools for data and information workflow; downloadable software for use in database and data query management, in the field of data query management; computer software for providing interoperability between different software applications, operating systems, and middle ware; content delivery computer software for exchanging data with other applications, computer operating system programs and utility programs; computer software for desktop publishing; computer search engine software; computer software for transmission via a global computer network of text, electronic documents, nodes, e-mail clients, e-mail servers, databases, graphics, multimedia, streaming media, and visualizations; productivity software namely data management software and group ware for others; computer software for peer-to-peer communications; computer software that allows utilization ~ of Internet applications of others, by providing database creation, query and management of electronic data files accessible from a global computer network, local computer network or any computer network; software for providing, encoding, deploying and using data, information and information workflow for retrieval of resources available on a global or local computer network; computer software for developing custom web sites by user and audiovisual information, web search, and web personalization | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing use of on-line nondownloadable software for use in database management; providing customized online web pages featuring user-defined information, which includes search engines and online web links to other web sites; providing information of general interest at the specific request of end-users over local and global networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2005 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |