USPTO serial 78041213
LEARNING TABLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEARNING TABLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR RECEIVING, STORING AND DISPLAYING ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS; PRERECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES, COMPACT DISCS, AUDIO TAPES, DVDS IN THE FIELD OF GATHERING INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE; STORAGE CASES FOR VIDEO CASSETTES, COMPACT DISC, AUDIO TAPES AND DVDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING OF FICTION AND NON FICTION; EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PRODUCTION OF RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS, AUDIO RECORDING AND PRODUCTION, DIGITAL VIDEO DISC AND VIDEO PRODUCTION, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS AND TRAINING ACCESSED THROUGH THE USE OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK ALL ON THE SUBJECT OF GATHERING INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE; PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT OF GATHERING INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by B AWARE NATION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Letzer, Sally
- Other trademarks owned by Letzer, Sally
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LEARNING TABLET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |