USPTO serial 78043523
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Zaltbommel, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES80 S HIGHLAND AVETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDGOSSINING, NY 10562| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic apparatus and instruments, not included in other classes; apparatus for the broadcasting and receiving of signals; electronic security systems; electronic keys; apparatus for remote control for the use of electronic apparatus in particular for computers, under which laptops and computer peripheral equipment; computers; registered computer programs; peripheral equipment and peripheral instruments for computers; computer apparatus (hardware) and computer software for the protection of computer software and computer hardware. | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper, tapes and cards for recording computer programs; manuals and printed instruction materials, newsletters, magazines, publications and other printed matter. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Setting up and writing of computer programs, advisory and guidance with regard to electronic processing of information and data, designing of computer security systems, technical advisory in the field of computer apparatus and computer software, systems analysis. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |