USPTO serial 78045305
EJIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EJIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregg R. Zegarelli
KIMBERLY J PIERSON REED SMITH LLPPO BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION; BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, BUSINESS MODELS, AND WORK FLOW PROCEDURES; BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1999 |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELDS OF DATA AND INFORMATION PROCESSING, COMPUTER NETWORKS, INTERNET TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION FOR OTHERS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW COMPUTER AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS; DESIGN AND INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ENGINEERING IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS; CREATION OF WEB SITES USED ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, NAMELY, CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |