USPTO serial 78048563
HD CCTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HD CCTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Anthony Rolfe
J ANTHONY ROLFE WENTHUR & CHACHAS4180 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DRSTE 500LA JOLLA, CA 92037Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BURGLAR ALARMS, WARNING DEVICES, NAMELY BELLS, CIRCUIT BOARDS, HIGH DEFINITION CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION CAMERAS, VIDEO AND SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS, COMPUTER CHIPS, ELECTRICAL AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS, MOTION DETECTORS, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE TO CONTROL BUILDING ENVIRONMENT, COMPUTER CONTROL OVER CLOSED CIRCUIT CAMERAS AND VIDEO CAMERAS, ACCESS AND SECURITY SYSTEMS, LASERS NOT FOR MEDICAL USE, ELECTRIC LOCKS, VIDEO MONITORS, PERSONAL SECURITY ALARMS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN RUNNING AND MANAGING SECURITY SYSTEMS, REMOTE CONTROL FOR SECURITY SYSTEMS, SIRENS, ELECTRONIC MOTION SENSITIVE SWITCHES AND THEFT ALARMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |