Drawing for MAE CENTRAL

USPTO serial 78049656

MAE CENTRAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAE CENTRAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anita Odonovich

ANITA ODONOVICH MCI WORLDCOM BRANDS, LLC1133 NINETEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038providing internet traffic exchange facilities, also known as network access points, to internet service providers and other internet traffic carriers for the exchange of regional, national, and global internet traffic; and providing cross connect services to internet service providers and other internet traffic carriers at such traffic exchange facilities for interconnection with other internet service providers and other internet traffic carriersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 29, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 6, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance