USPTO serial 78052593
SLIMWISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2952869Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SLIMWISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Florida City, FL
Florida City, FL
Florida City, FL
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |