USPTO serial 78062665
ENERGYTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENERGYTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver E. Todd, Jr.
OLIVER E TODD JR MACMILLAN SOBANSKI & TODD LLC1 MARITIME PLZ FL 4TOLEDO, OH 43604-1853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metal windows and doors | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |