USPTO serial 78063602
DRI-SEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2842839Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 2004
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DRI-SEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathan W. Johnson, Esq.
Nathan W. Johnson, Esq. Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP1819 Fifth Avenue NorthIntellectual Property GroupBirmingham, AL 35203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | PRE-LUBRICATED NON-METAL VALVE GASKETS USED IN THE FIELD OF PLUMBING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 18, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |