USPTO serial 78064651
EREALTIST.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EREALTIST.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SARATOGA, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing temporary use of on-line, non-downloadable software via Internet for real estate professionals such as real estate agents, title company officers, mortgage company officers and their clients; providing on-line non-downloadable software for contact management, collaboration, and communication via the Internet; providing on-line non-downloadable software for document management, escrow and title process management, calendar and project management services via the Internet; providing computer services, namely, designing and maintaining web sites for real estate professionals; providing on-line non-downloadable software for preparing promotional materials, namely, preparing flyers, postcards, advertisings for use and print via the Internet; providing on-line computer databases featuring information in the fields of real estate, mortgage, schools and neighborhood via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |