USPTO serial 78064912
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
3520 Farum, DK
3520 Farum, DK
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER AND PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR NEUTRALIZING THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF CANCER TREATMENT; VETERINARY PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER IN ANIMALS AND VETERINARY PREPARATIONS FOR NEUTRALIZING THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF CANCER TREATMENT OF ANIMALS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |