USPTO serial 78065676
INTOXICATING PLEASURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTOXICATING PLEASURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cologne, perfume, eau de toilette, bath and shower gel, bath bombs, bath crystals, body and face moisturizer, body and face mask, body and face cream, body and face lotion, body and face defoliator, body mist, body and hand soap, liquid soap, body and foot scrub, foot cream, skin cleanser and clarifier, toner, non medicated skin lightener, sunscreen, taming oil and cream, eye make up, eye liner, eye shadow, eye cream, make up, blush, rouge, face powder, make up remover, nail polish, lipstick, lip liner, lip gloss, lip balm, AROMATHERAPY, NAMELY; essential oils for personal use, massage lotion and oils, incense, fragrance balm | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | CANDLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |