USPTO serial 78066685
SALAMINA DESIGNED BY ROCKWELL KENT, VERNON KILNS MADE IN U.S.A.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SALAMINA DESIGNED BY ROCKWELL KENT, VERNON KILNS MADE IN U.S.A.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Tea pots not of precious metal; coffee pots not of precious metal; plates; dishes; dishes for soap; dishes for soap; dishes for butter; glasses for drinking; glasses for beverage; tea sets; bowls; glass bowls; salad bowls; rinsing bowls; napkin holders; napkin rings not made of precious metal; mugs of earthenware; mugs of porcelain; holders for flowers and plants; goblets; gardening gloves; flower baskets; flower pots; flasks; figurines made of china; drinking glasses; decanters; decorative plates; cups for coffee; crystal prisms; cooling buckets for wine; coffee pots not of precious metal; tea pots not of precious metal; coasters not of paper or linen; china ornaments; sun catchers; candelabras not of precious metal; wood chopping boards for kitchen use; tankards not of precious metal; stands for dishes; spoons for basting; spoons for mixing; spoons for serving; slotted spoons; soup serving bowls; spatulas; snuffers for candles; serving platters; commemorative plates; decorative plates; paper plates; picnic baskets; piggy banks not made of metal; perfume sprayers sold empty; pepper mills; ice pails; lunch pails; ornaments made of china | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Everlasting Look, Inc, The
- Other trademarks owned by Everlasting Look, Inc, The
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SALAMINA DESIGNED BY ROCKWELL KENT, VERNON KILNS MADE IN U.S.A.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |