USPTO serial 78067139
WE BRING GOOD THINGS TO LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WE BRING GOOD THINGS TO LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS FOR DISPLAYING DIAGNOSTIC IMAGES; NAMELY, SPOT FILM APPARATUS, X-RAY IMAGE INTENSIFIERS, X-RAY FLUOROSCOPES, MOBILE X-RAY UNITS, RADIOGRAPHIC FILM VIEWERS, COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, NUCLEAR RESONANCE SCANNERS, ULTRASOUND SCANNERS, MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNERS; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, GRADIENT COILS, PATIENT AND FETAL MONITORING APPARATUS, SURGICAL AND VASCULAR IMAGING APPARATUS, BONE DENSITOMETERS, DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY APPARATUS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |